Criminal conflict as collective punishment
نویسنده
چکیده
While political conflicts have been extensively studied by political scientists, criminal conflicts have received much less attention, especially by theorists in the field. Focusing on the latter type of conflict, we address why an individual crime across an ethnic or tribal border often leads to large-scale violence. Building on rational choice theory, we present three hypothetical mechanisms which may account for criminal conflicts: (i) Avengers penalize any suspects in the culprit’s social group because they cannot identify the culprit; (ii) Avengers inflict a vicarious punishment on the culprit’s significant others because such vicarious punishment can be more severe for the culprit than a mere penalty on the culprit himself; (iii) By demanding collective responsibilities, avengers urge the target group to police its fellows and to suppress deviant behavior against outsiders. Historical incidents and recent case studies suggest the third is most compelling.
منابع مشابه
عظمت نمادین حدود و موانع اجرایی آن؛ تأملی فلسفی و جامعهشناختی
Islamic criminal policy has a various kind of punishment that each of them has different logic and purpose. Hadd punishment is based on the criminal behavior and protect the social values for protect moral and social order. So this type of crimes, because of these are the most sever crimes, are punishable with the most severe punishment. Nevertheless, proof of this crime is too hard. Also, ...
متن کاملThe approach of the legal system of Islamic countries regarding the issuance of criminal sentences based on jurisprudential sources
One of the most important principles of criminal law, which is an effective guarantee for the protection of civil rights and freedoms, is the principle of legality of crime and punishment, which prescribes the imposition of punishment for crime only on the basis of the Legal texts. However, in the legal systems of Muslim countries, whose penal provisions are derived from Islamic law, the issue ...
متن کاملCauses of Judicial and Legal Criminal Policy Disagreement in Drug-Related Offenses from the Legal-Ethical Approach
Background: The legislative review of the criminal record on the crime of repetition and the severity of the punishment for repeated offenders indicates that the legislator firstly used various laws to include repetition of crime, and in some cases such as drug offenses and for criminal reasons. It has taken into account a certain degree of exacerbation that is markedly different from what is s...
متن کاملToward a Developmental and Comparative Conflict Theory of Race, Ethnicity, and Perceptions of Criminal Injustice
The perception of criminal injustice is common among disadvantaged American racial and ethnic minority groups. This perception of injustice is especially common for highly educated and socially and economically successful African-Americans. It is also well established that encounters between citizens and the police play an important part in such perceptions of racial injustice. Yet, there is mu...
متن کاملIran’s Criminal Policy Regarding Double Punishment in International Criminal Law
Different nations’ tendency to expand their judicial and legislative territory outside their ruling kingdom has caused conflicts in the criminal qualification and the coming into existence of legal bad effects. Among these bad effects is the double or additional punishment of someone who has been tried and received their penalty in another country before, which is at odds with the principles of...
متن کامل